An AI that remembers your life.

The existing products fail in two directions, and both are well documented. The first is engagement. An app that is paid to keep you talking will keep you talking, and researchers analysing 35,390 excerpts from human–AI relationships have catalogued exactly where that leads.

The second is fragility. When these apps change their models, people lose something they had come to depend on — a study of 210,840 Play Store reviews describes the fallout in users' own words. Something you are asked to open up to should not be able to become a stranger overnight.

Underneath both is the same design choice: an assistant that forgets. Every conversation starts from nothing, so the only thing it can offer is tone. That is why they all sound the same — endless validation, and the question about how that made you feel.

The thing we think matters is memory, and memory of a particular kind. superemotion does not keep your transcripts. After it replies, it reads the conversation back and records what it found — the people in your life, where they are, what happened, what is coming — as a graph of facts, each with a type, a connection to you, and a date it was true.

That structure is what lets the right detail come back at the right moment instead of everything coming back at once. When someone comes up again, it follows the links and brings in at most three things that matter, and nothing that does not.

It is also what lets the replies be shorter and more direct. An AI that knows this is the third cancellation this month can say so. One that starts from nothing can only be kind.

We will not optimise for time spent. The measure we care about is whether the thing you said last week came back usefully this week, not how long you stayed.

We will not read your conversations. Every message and every remembered fact is encrypted before it reaches the database under a key of its own. Replies are written on AWS Bedrock, which does not train on them, and our own traces record timing and cost, never content.

We want to be exact about what that is worth. superemotion holds the secret those keys come from, because an AI that has to answer you has to be able to read you. So encryption defends your words against a stolen database, not against us. That sentence above is a promise we are making, not a mathematical fact, and you should hold us to it as one.

And we will not pretend to be care. superemotion is not a crisis service and not a substitute for a person. If you are in danger, contact your local emergency number. We would rather say that plainly than let the product imply otherwise.

Early. superemotion is in the hands of a small group of people having real conversations with it, and nothing is priced or promised yet. We would rather get the memory right for a few people than get it approximately right for everyone.